Page 23 - RUT Publisher
P. 23
Life Science Research and Sustainable Development ISBN: 978-98-84663-33-9
through chemical mutagenesis. Cogent Food & Agriculture.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2014.1000715.
2. Amin. R., Laskar, R. A., Khursheed, S., Raina, A. and Khan. S. (2016). Genetic sensitivity
towards mms mutagenesis assessed through in Vitro growth and cytological test in Nigella
Sativa L. Life Sciences International Research Journal.3: 2347-8691.
3. Bhatia, C. R., K. Nichterlein, and M. Maluszynski, (1999). Oilseed cultivars developed from
induced mutations and mutations altering fatty acid composition. Mut. Breed. Rev. 12: 1-36.
4. FAO. (2009). How to Feed the World in 2050. Insights from an Expert Meeting at FAO.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00312.x
5. FAO. (2011). State of Food and Agriculture 2010-2011. In Lancet. https://doi.org/ISSN 0081-
4539.
6. Gaul H (1964). Mutations in plant breeding. Radiation Botany 4: 155–232.
7. Goyal, S. and Khan, S.A. (2009). Comparative study of chromosomal aberrations in Vigna
mungo induced by ethyl methane sulphonate and hydrazine hydrate. Thai J. Agric. Sci.
42(3):177-82.
8. Jain, S. M. (2010). Mutagenesis in crop improvement under the climate change. Romanian
biotechnological letters. 15(2): 88-106.
9. Jankowicz-Cieslak, J., & Till, B. J. (2016). Forward and reverse genetics in crop breeding. In
Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-22521-0-8.
10. Khursheed, S., Laskar, R. A., Raina, A., Amin, R. & K. S. (2015). Comparative analysis of
cytological abnormalities induced in Vicia faba L. genotypes using physical and chemical
mutagenesis. Chromosome Science, 18(3–4), 47–51.
11. Khursheed, S., Raina, A. and Khan, S. (2016). Improvement of yield and mineral content in two
cultivars of Vicia faba L. through physical and chemical mutagenesis and their character
association analysis. Arch. Curr. Res. Int. 4(1): 1-7.
12. Maluszynski, M., B. S. Ahloowalia, and B. Sigurbjörnsson, (1995). Application of in vivo and
in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica, 87(1-3): 303-315.
13. Maluszynski, M., L. van Zanten, A. Ashri, H. Brunner, B. Ahloowalia, F. J. Zapata, and E.
Weck, (1995). Mutation techniques in plant breeding. In: Induced Mutations and Molecular
Techniques for Crop Improvement. IAEA, Vienna. pp.489-504.
14. Raina, A., Laskar, R., Khursheed, S., Amin, R., Tantray, Y., Parveen, K., & Khan, S. (2016). Role
of Mutation Breeding in Crop Improvement Past, Present and Future. Asian Research Journal
of Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2016/29334.
15. Shu, Q. Y., Forster, B. P., & Nakagawa, H. (2012). Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology.
In Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640853.0000.
16. Tantray, A.Y., Raina, A., Khursheed, S., Amin, R. & Khan, S. (2015). Chemical Mutagen affects
Pollination and Locule Formation in Capsules of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.). International
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1), 108–117.
17. Usharani, K. S., & Ananda Kumar, C. R. (2015). Mutagenic effects of gamma rays and EMS on
frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll mutations in urdbean (Vigna Mungo (L.) Hepper).
Indian Journal of Science and Technology. https:// doi.org/ 10.17485/ ijst/ 2015/
v8i10/54201.
18. Wani, M.R. et al. (2011) Induced chlorophyll mutations. I. Mutagenic effectiveness and
efficiency of EMS, HZ and SA in mungbean. Frontiers of Agriculture in China 5(4), 514–518.
https://jesjalna.org/Zoology-Publications/index.html 15 Department of Zoology, J. E. S. College, Jalna

